Comments on: Entaggle: Usability, UX and the business model part 3

By: The Tester's Headache: Carnival of Testers #20

The Tester's Headache: Carnival of Testers #20 — Fri, 01 Apr 2011 06:38:26 +0000

[...] McMillan made quite an in-depth (3 part) analysis of the site, some business case and usability [...]

By: Darren McMillan

Darren McMillan — Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:04:05 +0000

Hi Mohinder,

Only Elisabeth knows what the true goal for Entaggle is. I personally hope it works out well as I have a lot of respect for her and think it’s a great idea.

I think the reason for the lack of interest is because it’s a multi part blog post, people generally don’t like to read large posts, never mind large multi part posts.

I took this as a chance to share my way of thinking and I’m very happy I did, as it’s not every day an innovative product like this comes along.

Thanks,

Darren.

By: Mohinder Khosla

Mohinder Khosla — Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:45:05 +0000

It is very difficult to predict business model of a product that is constantly evolving. Elisabeth a step ahead of our thinking in some ways. You have made some nice suggestions and valid one too. Whether Entaggle is going to be standalone product or intergate with other social media products such as twitter. In my opinion, repeating the success of linkedin and its customer base would be very hard to beat. This can only be achieved through ingenuity and making Entaggle a unique product. There are reams of suggestions that people can made but few few would be worthy of merits. I would like tag to be hyperlinked so that you can link them to international conferences and tag someone who may be attending.
You wrapped the 3 part series with your thoughts nicely. I am surprised that not many people have commented or criticised on the contents.